
Route planning software is priced two fundamentally different ways. Some tools charge per driver or per user, often with a minimum seat count built in, so your bill can jump even before you’ve added a single real driver. Others charge based on how many addresses or orders you’re actually planning, so your driver count has nothing to do with the price. The difference sounds small until you actually run the numbers side by side.
| Tool | Pricing model | What grows the bill |
| Upper Route Planner | Per user, $50/user/month | Every driver or dispatcher added to the account |
| OptimoRoute | Per driver, $39/driver/month (Lite) or $49/driver/month (Pro), month-to-month, no minimum | Every driver added, regardless of route volume |
| Zeo Route Planner | Per driver, billed quarterly or yearly only, no month-to-month option, roughly $87/driver/quarter on the lower tiers | Every driver added, regardless of route volume |
| MyRouteOnline | Address-based, plans from $19/month for 50 orders up to $799/month for 15,000 orders | Order volume, not driver count, no per-seat charge at all, multiple drivers dispatched from one account |
Here’s where the difference actually shows up, and it’s most visible when a business genuinely grows, both in order volume and in headcount, which is normally how growth actually happens. Picture a delivery business starting at 50 addresses a month with 1 driver. Over time it grows tenfold to 500 addresses a month, and scales its team to 5 drivers to keep up. Here’s what that growth costs on each pricing model:
| Stage | Upper | OptimoRoute | Zeo | MyRouteOnline |
| 50 addresses/month, 1 driver | $50/month | $39/month | $87/quarter | $19/month |
| 500 addresses/month, 5 drivers | $250/month | $195/month | $435/quarter | $49/month |
| Increase | +400% | +400% | +400% | +158% |
Zeo doesn’t offer month-to-month billing, so that $87 and $435 are quarterly charges paid upfront every three months, not a monthly bill. A 5-driver team on Zeo is committing to $435 every quarter regardless of how that quarter actually goes, a different kind of commitment than a bill that can flex or be canceled month to month.
MyRouteOnline’s price does go up here. Tenfold order growth is real growth, and it costs more to plan. But look at the size of the increase relative to everyone else. Upper, OptimoRoute, and Zeo all charge per driver, so a 5x increase in headcount produces exactly a 5x increase in the bill, 400% higher, regardless of how much the actual order volume grew. MyRouteOnline’s bill grew too, but by 158%, less than half the rate, because it’s tracking the 10x growth in orders rather than the 5x growth in headcount, and route planning software gets more efficient to deliver per dollar as volume grows, not less.
That gap is the whole argument for address-based pricing in one table. Per-driver pricing punishes a business for solving a headcount problem, even when the software itself is doing more work than before, in this case planning 10 times as many stops for less than three times the price.
On per-driver or per-user pricing, yes, once you’re past any seat minimum, every driver added increases the bill. On address-based pricing, like MyRouteOnline’s, adding a driver doesn’t change the cost on its own, only the number of addresses or orders planned each month affects the price.
A seat minimum means a plan charges for a fixed number of user licenses regardless of how many people actually use the account. As a hypothetical example, a 2-person team on a plan with a 3-user minimum would pay for 3 seats either way, making the effective per-person cost higher than the advertised per-user rate. Not every per-user plan has a minimum, and terms change, so it’s worth confirming directly with the vendor rather than relying on older reviews.
Not always, it depends on order volume and team size. A single driver planning a very high volume of stops might pay less on some per-driver plans than on an address-based plan sized for that volume. Address-based pricing tends to win by the largest margin when a team’s headcount grows faster than its order volume, but even when both grow together, the increase on an address-based plan is usually smaller than the equivalent per-driver increase, since it tracks order volume rather than multiplying a flat rate by every new hire.
No. A flat, order-based fee avoids the per-driver scaling problem, but the flat amount itself still varies a lot between vendors. Some order-based plans have a free tier for very low volume, then jump to a much higher flat fee once that threshold is crossed, which can end up costing more than a tiered, address-based plan sized for the same volume.
Yes. MyRouteOnline dispatches routes to multiple drivers from a single account, with pricing based on order volume rather than a per-driver or per-seat charge at all.